Hello, everybody! I’m a student in Huazhong university of science and techology in China. As far as we know, a sutiable reviewer is excellent helpful to your paper, no matter whether your paper accepeted or not. There is no doubting that Choosing the reviewer just relying on the empirical is inefficient. Fox example, there are nearly 6088 editors in PLOS ONE journal and it is not an easy thing to choose the editor who know your paper best. Therefore, a thought arise in my mind
that whether we can build a recommendation mechanism to help us find the most sutiable review?
ROpenSci supplies an access to all the airticles punished in the Plos One journal, moreover, expertise information for every editor can also be obtain in the homepage of the journal. Based on the information in the articles (including the abstract, key word, main body and references) and expertise information, whether we can build a bridge to link the two?
Any comment is welcome and hope somebody can help me solve the problem!